Chicago vs Seattle
Not opinions, measured walking data. On what we can measure, Seattle leads 4–2. Character is a different question: Chicago is the city rebuilt after the fire; Seattle is the rainy port of the northwest.
Change the matchup
Places with a story
spots where a route tells you what happened there
Chicago
94
Seattle
46
Chicago leads
How often you pass a story
metres from one story to the next; fewer is better
Chicago
293
Seattle
249
Seattle leads
Historical figures
real people you meet in its stories
Chicago
11
Seattle
6
Chicago leads
Instagrammability
score /100, on the index’s fixed scale
Chicago
37
Seattle
43
Seattle leads
Group outings
of every 100 plays, how many bring a group of 3+
Chicago
22
Seattle
31
Seattle leads
International visitors
% of player reviews written in a foreign language
Chicago
2
Seattle
4
Seattle leads
| What we measure | Chicago | Seattle | Leads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Places with a storyspots where a route tells you what happened there | 94 | 46 | Chicago |
| How often you pass a storymetres from one story to the next; fewer is better | 293 | 249 | Seattle |
| Historical figuresreal people you meet in its stories | 11 | 6 | Chicago |
| Instagrammabilityscore /100, on the index’s fixed scale | 37 | 43 | Seattle |
| Group outingsof every 100 plays, how many bring a group of 3+ | 22 | 31 | Seattle |
| International visitors% of player reviews written in a foreign language | 2 | 4 | Seattle |
Differences under 5% count as ties. Sample sizes and definitions on the methodology page.
What their stories are about
How many places with a story each city has per theme: Chicago in orange, Seattle in blue. All bars share one scale, so lengths are comparable everywhere on the chart.
Chicago scorecard →
The city rebuilt after the fire
Seattle scorecard →
The rainy port of the northwest