Chicago vs San Francisco
Not opinions, measured walking data. On what we can measure, Chicago leads 4–1 (1 within the tie margin). Character is a different question: Chicago is the city rebuilt after the fire; San Francisco is the gold rush city.
Change the matchup
Places with a story
spots where a route tells you what happened there
Chicago
94
San Francisco
60
Chicago leads
How often you pass a story
metres from one story to the next; fewer is better
Chicago
293
San Francisco
329
Chicago leads
Historical figures
real people you meet in its stories
Chicago
11
San Francisco
4
Chicago leads
Instagrammability
score /100, on the index’s fixed scale
Chicago
37
San Francisco
23
Chicago leads
Group outings
of every 100 plays, how many bring a group of 3+
Chicago
22
San Francisco
22
Tie
International visitors
% of player reviews written in a foreign language
Chicago
2
San Francisco
6
San Francisco leads
| What we measure | Chicago | San Francisco | Leads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Places with a storyspots where a route tells you what happened there | 94 | 60 | Chicago |
| How often you pass a storymetres from one story to the next; fewer is better | 293 | 329 | Chicago |
| Historical figuresreal people you meet in its stories | 11 | 4 | Chicago |
| Instagrammabilityscore /100, on the index’s fixed scale | 37 | 23 | Chicago |
| Group outingsof every 100 plays, how many bring a group of 3+ | 22 | 22 | tie |
| International visitors% of player reviews written in a foreign language | 2 | 6 | San Francisco |
Differences under 5% count as ties. Sample sizes and definitions on the methodology page.
What their stories are about
How many places with a story each city has per theme: Chicago in orange, San Francisco in blue. All bars share one scale, so lengths are comparable everywhere on the chart.
Chicago scorecard →
The city rebuilt after the fire
San Francisco scorecard →
The gold rush city